Case Name: JELD-WEN
Settlement Fund: $40,000,000
Claim Filing Deadline: November 15, 2021
Class Period: 1/26/2017 -- 10/15/2018
When one thinks of an industry in which a small cartel holds both its consumers and its competitors in its grip, naturally one thinks of the interior molded door skin market.
Oh, wait, you don’t think that? You don’t know even what a door skin is? Don’t you use at least one door every day?
Well, that’s OK. If you are familiar with the ins and outs (pun intended) of door skins, you may skip ahead. Door skins are the outer layer of interior molded doors found in most homes in America. Doors tend not to be made of solid wood anymore—
“But mine are!”
--yes, and you are also wearing a corduroy sport coat with a turtleneck and reading this on a Commodore 64, which is also uncommon. We are speaking about most people’s doors made these days, not in the 19th century. Doors today are mostly hollow with a mere skin to mimic the finely crafted molded doors of yore.
Thanks to recent consolidation and mergers in the American door industry, two companies, JELD-WEN and Masonite, comprise 85% of the interior molded door market and 100% of the door skin market. The plaintiff’s class action complaint, dated February 19, 2020, noted that, “Because the manufacturers comprising the other 15% of the interior molded doors market did not independently manufacture door skins, domestically, they were left with no choice but to purchase door skins from either Jeld-Wen or Masonite.”
This market, according to the plaintiffs, used to be competitive, but in October of 2012 JELD-WEN acquired another door manufacturer called CraftMaster Manufacturing, Inc. (CMI), and that is when the collusion allegedly began. “In late 2012,” Plaintiffs wrote in the complaint, “shortly after Jeld-Wen acquired CMI, Jeld-Wen and Masonite began imposing uniform price increases on interior molded doors. At least nine different times between 2012 and 2018, Jeld-Wen and Masonite increased the prices of their interior molded doors in the same or similar percentage increments, either simultaneously or in brief succession of each other.”
Defendants deny the allegations. There was a related antitrust suit against JELD-WEN and Masonite, which settled for $61,600,000, with the two companies contributing equal amounts and, natch, denying the allegations there too.
Chicago Clearing Corporation is preparing claims for this litigation, and for 38 other upcoming securities settlements. If you would like to talk about this litigation, some other litigations, or just gripe about how they don’t make ‘em like they used to, then give us a call today.
Plaintiff attorneys who specialize in securities class actions are currently investigating potential claims against the following firms: Credit Suisse Group AG, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, Novavax, and Organogenesis Holdings.
Below is a brief description of each inve... Read More
Case Name: Petrobras Fair Fund
Case Name: GreenSky
Case Name: Symantec, n/k/a NortonLifeLock
Settlement Fund: $70,000,000
Claim Filing Deadline: Read More
“I could go on and on, but bottom line, the fees being charged are much less than what I was spending in house to file and this is just one less thing I have to spend time trying to figure out how to complete on a consistent basis. Dealing with the CCC staff has been a very positive thing.”
“We were spending countless hours on class action claims before we signed on with CCC in January. Matt Murray and their technical team ensured our data transmission was seamless and secure. We found everyone at CCC to be professional, courteous, and accommodating.”
“Signing with CCC has made a huge difference. Before, it was horrible. We had to print thousands of pieces of paper, invite clients to come in and sit down with us to show them where to find the transactions, how to input them into the Proof of Claim forms. Now it's simple. It’s very nice to be able to tell our client, “You can shred that Proof of Claim form because CCC has it taken care of.”
Registered Investment Advisor
“Your client reporting portal and customer service is the reason we chose Chicago Clearing. I send the data on an annual basis to CCC and they take it from there. My clients are protected (if there is a class action, it is getting filed), the Bank is protected (we are meeting our fiduciary obligation by filing the claims)."